.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

really bad tattoos

images Re: ------gt;BAD TATTOOSlt;------ really bad tattoos. Pacman Tattoos | Walyou
  • Pacman Tattoos | Walyou



  • bfadlia
    02-16 01:57 PM
    I am sorry if I offended anyone. I don't recall how.
    and by the way, my friend, you really really need a life :-) That's the last thing you'll hear from me on this subject.
    peace out

    don't worry my friend.. it's not u.. that dummy has been using this fascist style of discussion on all threads
    just ignore him.. it infuriates him like hell.. u'll be amused with his later responses :)





    wallpaper Pacman Tattoos | Walyou really bad tattoos. ad tattoo
  • ad tattoo



  • inthehole
    07-18 12:07 PM
    Called USCIS just 5 mins back.. first a lady answered and asked me questions about the reason of calling..

    I explained that i am calling to find out the status of my i-485 application that i filed on June 25th. And I would like to know when will i get my receipt no.

    The lady asked me to stay on the line and transferred to another person.

    Another lady picked up and asked my last name.. I told my last name. (i did not spell my last name)

    She asked for reason for calling..

    I said to I filed i-485 on June 25th and I did not get my receipt no yet..i said
    i would like to know when can i expect my receipt no..

    She put me on hold for few mins and came back and said
    "You have till August 17 to file your i-485. If we have visa numbers available and if your application is accepted, you will receive your receipt no before August 17"

    I said I aready filed my application on June 25, before the July bulletin.

    She said "listen carefully" and explained the same thing again.

    I said thank you and hung up..

    It doesn't make any sense.. I think(hope) she doesn't understand my question properly or she doesn't know the process..





    really bad tattoos. Tattoo Who?
  • Tattoo Who?



  • msgrewal81
    02-19 12:20 PM
    well said Jaime...We should support this bill..

    Read this carefully before you comment here:
    "fingerprints for information relating to criminal, national security, or other law enforcement actions that would render the alien ineligible for adjustment of status under this section".

    This is just to verify if the guys is in database for any criminal activity. ofcourse they will not give an illegal guy a GC if they have his record in database for criminal activity in US. This is just a formal requirement to keep illegal law brokers out because there are thousands illegals who came here from southern border and have committed crimes. There are some even in the America's Top 10 Wanted list. My uncles(came illegally here) went through all criminal checks by FBI for breaking any law,when Reagan gave amnesty for >5 years. Same criminal checks were done on illegals when Clinton helped legalalization of illegals. Fingerprints, etc are just for other criminal history check not to check if the person crossed the border illegally, ofcouse he did and broke the law: that's the whole point for him being illegal.

    In fact >5year rule has been a standard to give immigration to illegals as is clear by Reagan amnesty. If 5 year rule is not for illegals, then what do you think is there in this bill for 11 million illegals. Itn't that logical. Infact main purpose of this bill is to fix illegal immigrants not legals. If you think >5 years rule is just for legals, you need to read history books, read text carefully and be more logical: not blinded by desire to get your own GC if you are here >5years.

    Either way: I never said we should oppose the 5 year requirement. I just said that rules for "Legal <5 years" should be easier than rules for "illegal>5" years and please don't propagate false rumors here that this bill is just for legals in a blind desire for your own GC.





    2011 ad tattoo really bad tattoos. Tattoos are hot, and I don#39;t
  • Tattoos are hot, and I don#39;t



  • abracadabra102
    07-29 10:16 AM
    A lot of people act as if their God / Gods need their protection. My friends think about that before getting upset about these issues. Do the Gods really need your protection? or is it just your ego thats being hurt? Would Ganesha (in this case) be hurt by being on the beer bottle? Does the picture infact resemble him? has anybody seen Ganesha? I mean, this is 21st century and we have to think rationally before becoming sentimental over these issues. So long as you get hurt over these there will be people to insult you. Believe me my friend no human can ever hurt / insult a God (if there is infact one). so why bother? Maintain your personal relationship with Ganesha in your prayer and let him deal with such insults in his way. The only reality you will ever know is your neighbuor. Live and let others live life to the fullest and dont let religion / religious idease dictate your attitude towards this world. next time you see the beer, buy it and drink it if you enjoy alcoholic beverages.
    Great post.



    more...


    really bad tattoos. Lots of Bad Tattoos
  • Lots of Bad Tattoos



  • logiclife
    12-20 05:50 PM
    If you were not laid off, it is fine. Technically you are out of status only when you are laid off. If company didn't pay you that is probably an issue for the company not you.

    If you traveled out and came back to US with a proper visa stamping, your old "wrongdoings" are pardoned. That is what 245(k) is all about. If you are not filing your GC through the same employer, you are even better off.


    Relax !

    Your first paragraph is wrong. If you are not working, then you are out of status. Regardless of whether your employer formally terminated employment and formally cancelled your H1B. Out of status means staying in USA legally, but not doing what you are supposed to be doing. If you dont attend classes and go to college when on student visa, you are out of status even though you are legally present.

    Your second paragraph, about "old wrongdoing" being pardoned, yes, 245(k) would clear that. However, if he had disclosed it, then yes, he would be in the clear.

    Now keep in mind that everyone, goes out of job once in a while and is unemployed for 10-15 days or even a month during the course of time. Technically, that is out of status. But that doesnt mean everyone discloses it in their 485 form. Does that mean that everyone will get rejected ?





    really bad tattoos. really bad tattoo
  • really bad tattoo



  • gsc999
    07-01 10:45 PM
    When prominent business houses like Microsoft, Google, Cisco, Oracle and organizations like AILA seem powerless when it comes to influencing senators, lawmakers and government organizations like USCIS and DOS, what can IV team do to change the policies. Sorry I did not mean to criticize, but that's the truth, unfortunately!
    --
    Mandeep:

    Welcome to IV. Yes, the odds are overwhelming but not impossible. A small glimmer of hope is enough to bring thousands of like minded people stuck in retrogression and backlog to IV. I use to share your skepticism. Not anymore, IV has achieved a lot. I won't go down the list but lot more needs to be done, for that we need more members, to become more influential and effective.

    Hope to see you become more active here.



    more...


    really bad tattoos. worst tattoos ever.
  • worst tattoos ever.



  • SunnySurya
    07-28 12:18 PM
    To all other readers,

    Just to let every one know, I am a Hindu to the very root, but I am also the following:
    a) A human, who would prefer peace over violence
    b) An Indian, who loves the fact that it is country of Buddha and Gandhi
    c) An immigrant, who associate with other immigrants on this forum to be treated in fairness.
    d) A would be American, who would like provide the best values of this country to my kids.

    I am all that.....And I am proud of them all..





    2010 Tattoo Who? really bad tattoos. Re: ------gt;BAD TATTOOSlt;------
  • Re: ------gt;BAD TATTOOSlt;------



  • yawl
    07-16 05:13 PM
    they are shameless liars and racists



    more...


    really bad tattoos. really bad tattoos. really bad
  • really bad tattoos. really bad



  • svr_76
    06-10 02:21 PM
    Gr8 you win. now lets forge ahead on how to proceed and get similar details from other groups specially the high-tech lobby/group.





    hair Tattoos are hot, and I don#39;t really bad tattoos. Really bad tattoo Tattoo
  • Really bad tattoo Tattoo



  • Ramu25
    04-26 10:52 PM
    Can I apply for the adjustment of status by my self without the H1 - employers Notice.From L1 to H1.



    more...


    really bad tattoos. Here#39;s the dumbest tattoo ever
  • Here#39;s the dumbest tattoo ever



  • ComputeCompute
    07-22 06:39 PM
    Did Amendment 4319 not pass? So what happened?

    :confused:





    hot Lots of Bad Tattoos really bad tattoos. the Nazis was really very
  • the Nazis was really very



  • eb3_nepa
    04-10 08:07 AM
    Instead of letting members open 4 different threads, it is best that IV core itself opens the thread in RED so that it catches people's eyes and they post their comments in one spot rather than 4. AND it helps highlight the fact the bulletin is actually out.



    more...


    house This one wouldn#39;t be so bad, really bad tattoos. ad tattoo. not quite #39
  • ad tattoo. not quite #39



  • wandmaker
    10-10 01:07 PM
    Just to avoid all this , You can say I'm a US citizen and move on. They cannot ask for any verification can they?

    If verified, you would end up in eating ham burger.





    tattoo really bad tattoo really bad tattoos. Charles Manson Tattoo
  • Charles Manson Tattoo



  • Legal_In_A_Limbo
    03-14 05:51 PM
    Thanks for sharing the info. Did you get any new attorney?

    I self filed, as will be doing AC-21 in a month or so.
    So wanted to make sure i revoke my company attorney.

    Thanks



    more...


    pictures worst tattoos ever. really bad tattoos. this isn#39;t so bad, but mostly
  • this isn#39;t so bad, but mostly



  • ss777
    05-12 03:59 PM
    If we have all resources required to do MBA fulltime from a reputed school then there is no dilemea, one should opt for it. When resources are limited (need to work fulltime, has family with small kids, limited $$$ etc) then online is a better choice compared with part time. Students working for an Online MBA do develop good network and such degrees are being more and more accepted. Online course needs more descipline and dedication than the regular courses. The interaction between students and professor is more in a online course than in a part time course. You spend more time in research than in travel. Flexibility is another advantage.

    My client CIO did MBA from University of Pheonix in 2006 and he was hired as CIO in 2008. I am talking of a company with more than 5000 IT staff. So its my opinion that Online MBA is valued by the industry.

    http://rankings.ft.com/exportranking/online-mba-2009/pdf





    dresses the Nazis was really very really bad tattoos. good and a really bad idea
  • good and a really bad idea



  • sanju
    02-07 01:25 PM
    I support country quota otherwise all the greencards will be taken by Indians and Chinese and the people from small countries will not even get a chance. I am sorry but of you are born on one of these countries then you have to wait before everyone who filed earlier.

    If country quotas are removed in employment based category, skilled immigrants from other countries will get EQUAL chance just as skilled immigrants from India and China.

    Here is a problem arising as the result of country quotas -

    1.) Huge backlogs in EB green card categories
    2.) Consulting companies apply for H1 for more and more people from backlogged countries because it will take 6-12 years for people from countries that are backlogged in EB green card category. This causes more backlogged EB green card categories, and more incentive for consulting companies to hire from backlogged countries. So less people from other countries are hired on H1.

    As someone said on this forum, I took resume and my qualifications for the job interview, I did not take my birth certificate for the job interview. So why should the EB green card, which is a direct benefit of my employment, be judged based on where my birth certificate was issued?

    Country quota system is WRONG at every level. Its only a matter of time that it will be removed. Sorry, if your application is not approved before the removal of country quota system.

    .



    more...


    makeup really bad tattoos. really bad really bad tattoos. This one wouldn#39;t be so bad,
  • This one wouldn#39;t be so bad,



  • kumarc123
    02-09 12:13 PM
    and he does post some useful data (remember the recent backlog data he posted before they officially released it).

    anyway, why be so skeptical, don't we watch all the Superbowl ads but only buy the beer we like ;)

    My question to Pappu and IV is, what are you doing about this?

    Should we hold a rally like I last suggested, or again Iv core will Ignore?

    Time to act on Something,





    girlfriend Charles Manson Tattoo really bad tattoos. Worst Tattoos of All Time!
  • Worst Tattoos of All Time!



  • satishku_2000
    04-10 05:51 PM
    IEEE believes that ppl educated in the US should not be sent back and should actually stay here. I agree with that stance. After all, they want what is best for ppl born here and those who have been educated here. It is IEEE-USA :)


    As far as I know most of the "US educated foreigners"come here just to pursue thier higher education and have no intention of working here. Do they show their immigrant intent while applying for VISA and still get their student VISAs





    hairstyles Here#39;s the dumbest tattoo ever really bad tattoos. Nicole Richie VIRGIN Tattoo
  • Nicole Richie VIRGIN Tattoo



  • eilsoe
    02-16 06:52 PM
    I'll have a WIP screen up in a few minutes.. and then it's off to bed :sleep:





    venky08
    08-15 04:27 PM
    yes but they will start processing the applications based on the receipt dates. so if a guy applied last year, he gets priority over last month's people. (that is assuming that his priority dates were current last year from him to apply!)

    also they will need to do fingerprinting etc. and shall pass the FBI check before they get to final stage of adjudication. that would take 6 more months. so they should look at the bulletin at that time to see if they are eligible. dont get excited about these dates - they are not that helpful for the last month filers.


    What do these dates mean? If they are dates for who can apply in Sept, then all (those who could) have filed their AOS in July/August. Do they mean that in Sept 07 USCIS will be approving GC for those within these dates?





    Ramu25
    04-26 10:52 PM
    Can I apply for the adjustment of status by my self without the H1 - employers Notice.From L1 to H1.