.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

rapper tattoo

images Rapper Mike Jones tattoos. rapper tattoo. wallpapers Drake+rapper+
  • wallpapers Drake+rapper+



  • aditya
    11-10 09:55 AM
    From Jersey City Here

    reach me at aditya17.nyc@gmail.com





    wallpaper wallpapers Drake+rapper+ rapper tattoo. These days, tattoos are a
  • These days, tattoos are a



  • kanakabyraju
    07-13 07:23 AM
    YES. You will be all set.

    My PD is Oct. 07 (EB 2)

    Gurus.. pls advise.

    Could i expect my dates to be current by mid of 2011?

    Thanks,





    rapper tattoo. rappers tattoos - Hip hop
  • rappers tattoos - Hip hop



  • perm2gc
    01-10 09:24 PM
    http://forums.about.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ab-immigration&tid=13914





    2011 These days, tattoos are a rapper tattoo. star tattoos on chest
  • star tattoos on chest



  • prioritydate
    06-29 05:06 PM
    I am really happy for all those people who got their GC :)



    more...


    rapper tattoo. David Beckham#39;s Tattoos
  • David Beckham#39;s Tattoos



  • pappu
    05-07 12:27 AM
    cool down...I did pay for that effort, I am not a member of donor forum though..

    If you have paid and do not have access then send us an email to info at immigrationvoice.org with your payment details, name, email used to contribute and IV ID.

    We have added everyone that contributed. Sometimes there is a delay of a couple of days.





    rapper tattoo. Does your favorite rapper
  • Does your favorite rapper



  • va_217
    01-18 11:24 AM
    same happened to me in Elpaso airport longtime back, I guess when you are coming from Mexico they do that.
    but no questions asked it was normal

    thanks



    more...


    rapper tattoo. B.o.B (rapper) Beauty
  • B.o.B (rapper) Beauty



  • sc3
    10-16 06:05 PM
    What happened to your sense of judgment, whoever said that USCIS is doing it maliciously? They reacted for sure but within legal boundaries. I do not understand why you keep twisted people’s answers.


    I havent twisted anyone's answers. When you (and others) say "reacted" you mean that they are intentionally shafting you in some way. Do you dispute that? Why is the very first response to this idea something to the tune of "..and see the cutoff go back to ice ages". It clearly shows that people are saying USCIS will "revolt" against you (not necessarily in as many words).


    That is exactly I am saying, I am asking why should it be this way, this is totally wrong. They should go by PD. Even if my application was not moved to another centre mine still would not have gotten approved because I applied in Aug and not July. I mentioned that to tell you that I have to wait even more now.

    Now if you ask me why I applied in Aug and not in Jul, it is because my family was not in US at that time. If you had told me beforehand about the impending fiasco I wouldn’t have sent them in the first place. I had to call them back and cancel my trip spending hundreds of $s.


    Why is it not sustainable, now you are defending something that is wrong, why should I have to wait though my GC was started ages before?



    Let's see here; I don't need to know why you did not apply earlier, that is your personal matter. But answer me this.

    I have a PD of late 2002 (EB3), and haven't been able to apply due to personal reasons. Now when the PD becomes current. I apply and the following bulletin further advances the PD. Do you think that I should be given preference over someone who had no personal obligations and applied in 2007, that is to say, should the entire system be ground to a halt because I am a late filer?


    Now put yourself in the earlier RD's applicant? What will be your answer? Do you think someone who delays for personal reason be given a free pass just because he has an earlier PD??

    I know you dont want to hear it, but the current system of RD based processing is a good system. Your grouse probably is that they advanced the PDs so much further when there was enough demand from earlier PDs. If you argue on that premise, I will be very supportive. But I am insensitive to "I have an earlier PD, so I should get my GC first".

    PD has its place in the system, however it does not play a role in processing order.






    Just because I said USCIS is doing something wrong (not following processing order..) doesn’t mean I said that DOS did something right.. you keep assuming things..


    You were blaming USCIS for the Perm/BEC debacle, I did not assume anything you haven't already said.


    Again you are running your imagination wild, who blamed all the other things on USCIS?..

    I guess your computer has a bug, it is not showing the winkies and the smiles properly. Get a technician to look at it.


    Dude, show me one post of mine which said anything against the idea. I even gave a green for what he is trying to do, at least he is doing something while the rest of us are watching….

    I was responding to "bec", and you ended up debating the issue by supporting the idea that USCIS retaliated because of the July 07. I guess that makes it fair play for people to assume that you are against the original idea. I you consider it to be overreaching to make such connection, I apologize for that.





    2010 rappers tattoos - Hip hop rapper tattoo. Rapper Mike Jones tattoos.
  • Rapper Mike Jones tattoos.



  • like_watching_paint_dry
    01-19 04:26 PM
    Of course. Judges are the ones who interpret the laws. Officers just do what they are instructed to do. My point was just out of curiosity, how I think this law is being interpreted.

    But of course. My opinion is not only not to argue with officers, but don't even talk to them. When I feel that officer wants some "conversation" with me, my favorite response is "sorry officer, me no understand, no speak english". period. Smile to his face, keep saying "sorry". Don't show any extra document - just only what is required, nothing extra. Officer can be asking any questions, just hand him business card of your lawyer, say "my lawyer, talk him". as worse English you will use, as better it will be for you. My experience.

    When I first entered United States I was kept at secondary check for 4 hours (1999, IAD, Virginia). They kept asking me all kinda questions, it was no end. Finally I got pissed, I said "Sorry, I don't speak English good" and started playing with them. I took my dictionary and starting looking up every word. My next answer took 5 minutes. In next 5 minutes a woman walked to me, handed my documents and said "Welcome to America".

    LOL. That's an interesting approach. I've heard of a story where a hispanic dude who had a beer breath actually get out of a breathalyzer test and eventually get off a potential DUI conviction because of lack of evidence. His excuse was he could not understand the instructions the officer was giving...
    "no comprende..."
    "put your mouth here and phoo phoo ..."
    "no comprende..."



    more...


    rapper tattoo. rapper tattoos.
  • rapper tattoos.



  • signifer123
    02-14 08:42 PM
    well its yuor lucky day my good freind, because today you get to fidn a 3d progrma that you like from this great list on the net

    http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=202348





    hair star tattoos on chest rapper tattoo. Drake+rapper+tattoo
  • Drake+rapper+tattoo



  • peer123
    07-13 09:20 AM
    Agree, she is just trying to cash on the momentum and probalby later claim credit if favorable changes are made. But , it should not bother us as it only going to help us and not hurt us.

    I agree with you,... Lets accept it. Nothing is FREE in this world...

    There is something called corporate alignment in every aspect of the business. She doing it - if it helps her as well as us. So be it.

    we should be able to combine all forces and go at it....



    more...


    rapper tattoo. Tattoos, Rap, and Saggy Pants
  • Tattoos, Rap, and Saggy Pants



  • CADude
    02-21 11:15 AM
    Please see my response below.
    To interfile, do we need to start the PERM/140 process again for a different EB2 position?
    YES
    Do we port the date from EB3 to EB2 while we apply for EB2 140?
    YES
    Is this a straight forward process? What happens if interfiling is denied?
    Nothing. Your EB3 case is still pending





    hot David Beckham#39;s Tattoos rapper tattoo. rapperthe rapper tattoo
  • rapperthe rapper tattoo



  • sunny1000
    07-24 10:18 AM
    my lawyer says the same thing..no employer letter needed for concurrent filing...do't know what to believe...Pappu, can you please post the link to the USCIS memo, if you have it?

    Thanks much.



    more...


    house rapper tattoos. rapper tattoo. jim jones tattoos. Rapper Jim
  • jim jones tattoos. Rapper Jim



  • jk999
    05-27 09:05 PM
    Once I went to Staples to make photocopies of my passport and the lady suggested it is illegal to make photocopies of such documents unless the copy size is at least 50% bigger.

    I like the idea anyway given the small details in the passport. So I've been doing that whenever I have to make copies.

    This post has been an awakening to me. I have traveled in and out of northern NH numerous times but have never ever had this happen to me. Such incidents renew the reality for me that I am just a temp here.





    tattoo Does your favorite rapper rapper tattoo. Drake+rapper+tattoo
  • Drake+rapper+tattoo



  • vkrishn
    07-16 11:32 AM
    Don't know about his company...but the attorney definitely must be quite rich with all the legal charges :D

    Its all about investing in the employee and has worked so far. ROI to the company is huge if the employee is taken care of (atleast on immigration issues). Employee can just concentrate on getting the job done and making sure the best products come out of the door on time to the end user making the company profitable.

    My take: Money they spend on immigration issues (Law Firm, Renewals) should be peanuts to the profit the company makes.



    more...


    pictures B.o.B (rapper) Beauty rapper tattoo. the worst tattoos EVER!
  • the worst tattoos EVER!



  • immigrationmatters30
    09-19 02:25 PM
    What if 485 was not filed but have an approved 140? Economy is taking big hits on the all the consulting firms even the big ones.I know this because I work for one and I was told budget spending on IT is going to be really tight moving forward for another couple of years espcially in financial sector.





    dresses rapperthe rapper tattoo rapper tattoo. The singer/rapper, who has
  • The singer/rapper, who has



  • letstalklc
    06-11 12:21 PM
    Thanks IV, great tool to send out emails.



    more...


    makeup rapper tattoos. rapper tattoo. rapper tattoos.
  • rapper tattoos.



  • makemygc
    01-30 08:33 PM
    [QUOTE=logiclife]Unpaid bench means you are "Out of Status". Not illegal.

    I don't agree at all with this statement. People can go on a unpaid maternity leave and still maintain status.

    Out of status is anyway no better than illegal.





    girlfriend Drake+rapper+tattoo rapper tattoo. rapper tattoos. studio in lace
  • rapper tattoos. studio in lace



  • crazyghoda
    01-30 02:20 PM
    Ok now I am confused. I was laid off while in India. Since I could not then use my H1 to reenter, I used the AP. So my I-94 is stamped as AOS. Are you saying this was not a lawful admission? Are you implying that from the time I entered the US on AP (Dec till date) is unlawful?


    Since 245(k) allow status check since last lawful admission, only details that matters is, since last admission. Please note that entry into US on AP does NOT count as lawful admission. It has to be non-immigrant visa.

    245(k) allows a waiver of 180 cumulative days for out-of-status since last lawful admssion (i.e. on H1/H4/L1/L2/F1 etc).

    Please have all AC-21 related documents for latest job (or job offer).





    hairstyles Tattoos, Rap, and Saggy Pants rapper tattoo. The Game Sports Tattoo Update
  • The Game Sports Tattoo Update



  • NKR
    10-16 03:24 PM
    So to put extensive blame on USCIS for the "reaction" (I assume you are talking about the backlogs) is not right.

    Read your above sentence, then read your below sentence. If I try to find a relation between these two sentences I do not know what you are talking.


    Firstly: If USCIS was reacting, they would not have approved the so called "newer" applications.


    Second: When you say "approving" newer applications, are you saying approving older applications by PD or older applications by RD/ND (with older being 3-4 year older RD/PD)?? USCIS has never had to process applications by PD, only factor they have is RD/ND. PD just tells when someone can be approved (or apply), it doesn't get you any priority in the processing queue. I am sure you dont want the situation where you have your later PD, earlier RD, but someone who chose to delay his app to come with an ancient PD, but a fresh RD to get processed ahead of you (when both of you are current) do you?

    Again I am not sure what you are saying but MY PD is in early 2004 and RD was in Aug, they moved my application to another centre and my new RD is Oct. then I saw 2006 and 2007 cases getting approved. This is not right, why are they going by RD and not on PD?.


    I am bit out of touch, but isn't PERM/BEC a DoL operation not USCIS. Then again, those were the factors you have no control. Even when it was just the Labor Cert process, there had been disparities between various processing centers. Some people made use of provisions (sometimes fraudulently) to get their LCs through these "fast" process centers. I too have been affected by the Perm/LC situation, but I don't think USCIS is to take blame on that.

    Exactly dude, there should be some synchronization between DOL and USCIS. Just saying that USCIS is not responsible for DOL�s actions does not solve the problem, they can conveniently blame each other and take till eternity to process applications and you will keep saying the same thing that USCIS is not to be blamed.


    Am I defending USCIS: No, I am just saying if people want a Flower campaign, they should go ahead with it. No point putting FUD to stop people from doing what they want.

    No, you did not say that, all you said was USCIS is not doing anything wrong.





    alisa
    01-18 09:41 PM
    I have been unable to access that powerpoint.
    Could something please be posted here.





    sodh
    07-24 06:02 PM
    What i have heard is that the recent I140 approvals (2006/07) contains A#.
    Only the ones who were on OPT.